Opioid abuse

Written Assignment: Research Proposal Topic For this assignment you will provide details about your proposed research topic. You will develop a research question, state your hypothesis, define your variables and operational definitions, and indicate the appropriate inferential test for your proposed study. The assignment will help you prepare for the Final Research Proposal due at the end of this course. You are free to propose whatever type of study you wish (as long as it is relevant to the behavioral sciences), but If you are thinking of using this proposed research for your capstone course you may want to ask a question that can be feasibly carried out here. That means you may want to avoid research designs that would require the use of protected populations such as children, prisoners, the elderly, mentally disabled individuals, etc. (see the IRB guidelines for more details on this). The IRB will also not allow questions about illicit drug use or other illegal behaviors. In the capstone course you will be restricted to studies that can be carried out in 12 weeks available and you will be responsible for any monetary costs associated with the study, so keep these in mind. For this assignment you should answer the following using complete sentences: What is the research question your study seeks to answer? A good research question must be specific so that it can be answered with a research project. For example, “what causes depression?” is too broad and could not be answered in a study. “Is sunlight exposure related to depression?” would be a good research question because it is specific enough to be answered in a study. For this course, your research question should focus on the relationship between only two variables related to psychology or the behavioral sciences. Be careful with the language you use in your research question. Terms like “effects”, “impacts”, “leads to”, etc. would all imply a causal relationship, which would only be appropriate if your study employs an experimental design. If your study is nonexperimental, your research question should instead use terms like “relationship”, “correlation”, “is related to”, “predicts”, “is associated with” etc. What is the hypothesis for your study? A hypothesis indicates the specific predicted relationship between the variables in a study. If you are investigating a correlation, indicate the predicted strength and direction of the relationship. If you are performing an experiment indicate the expected causal relationship. What are the variables you will explore in your research question? A variable is any measurable event, situation, behavior, or individual characteristic that varies (has at least two values). In your study you will be looking at a relationship (either causal or correlational, depending on your research design) between two variables. You should indicate which variable would be considered the independent variable and which would be considered the dependent variable. If your study is an experiment, the independent variable is the variable that you will be manipulating, and the dependent variable is the variable that will be measured. If your study is nonexperimental, determining which variable is the independent and dependent is sometimes ambiguous. However, the independent variable is generally the variable that you think may cause or predict the dependent variable. For a research question such as “Is sunlight exposure related to depression?” the independent variable would be “sunlight exposure” and the dependent variable would be “depression”. What are the operational definitions for each of your variables? If your variable is quantitative (represented numerically) the operational definition will be how you plan to measure the variable. This may be through self-report survey questions, observations of behavior, physiological recordings, etc. If your variable is nominal (categorical), your operational definition should clearly define each category. What research methods will your proposed study employ? Indicate whether your proposed study would be generally considered an experiment or a nonexperiment. If your proposed study is nonexperimental, indicate the specific type of research method that you are using (naturalistic observation, systematic observation, case study, archival research, survey research, etc.). If you proposed study is an experiment, indicate what specific experimental design you plan to use (posttest only, pretest-posttest, etc.) and identify the experimental and control group(s). You should also explain the sampling method you will use to select your participants (simple random sampling, convenience sampling, etc.) and explain why this sampling method is appropriate for your proposed study. What inferential test would be most appropriate for analyzing data in your proposed study? First, you should identify the most appropriate measurement scale for each variable in your study (nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio). Then, using the flow chart provided below, identify the most appropriate statistical test for your proposed study. Be aware that, in the flow chart, interval and ratio scales are interchangeable and are both simply called “scale”. Choosing a Topic for the Final Research Proposal In this module you will be selecting a topic for your Final Research Proposal assignment. Your topic should be relevant to psychology or the behavioral sciences. When choosing a topic for your research proposal you should consider the following: Try to choose a topic that is interesting or relevant to you personally. You may want to consider a topic that is relevant to current events or that is “hot” in popular culture. Choose a topic that is not too broad. For example, “Depression” would be too broad a topic. There is simply too much information about this topic to be summarized in a literature review. A more specific topic related to “Depression” would be “The relationship between exposure to sunlight and depression”. Since your proposed study will be investigating the relationship between two variables, you may consider two topics that you find interesting and combine them into a single topic. For example, if you are interested in both attention deficit disorder (ADHD) and sleep, your proposed topic could be “The relationship between sleep and ADHD symptoms”. If you are having trouble coming up with a good topic you can contact me to do a bit of brainstorming or you can check out the following links: Psychology Research Paper Topics: 50+ Great Ideas Association for Psychological Science: Research Topics APA: Psychology Topics Psychology Today: Basics Interesting Research Topics Psychology Students Should Work On For this assignment you will provide details about your proposed research topic. You will develop a research question, state your hypothesis, define your variables and operational definitions, and indicate the appropriate inferential test for your proposed study. The assignment will help you prepare for the Final Research Proposal due at the end of this course.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Professional Leadership Communication and the Healthcare Practice Scholar Guidelines

Professional Leadership Communication and the Healthcare Practice Scholar Guidelines

The purpose of this paper is to explore and explain verbal, non-verbal, and written communication at the highest professional level. This assignment allows for the assimilation of professional leadership competencies as a doctorally prepared healthcare practice scholar.

  • 6-8 Scholarly Sources:
  • 5-7 pages excluding Title and References

Introduction

In a brief paragraph, introduce your paper’s topic and establish its importance. Present a clear purpose statement and a mini-outline, in sentence format, of the paper. The best introductions outline the paper according to the major sections in the assignment guidelines (which are the required level 1 headings for the body of the paper).
Level 1 Headings in APA
1. Verbal Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar
This section describes the leadership competency of verbal communication for the practice scholar. Present your understanding of the components, comportment, and collaborative nature of effective and ineffective verbal communication as a leader.
2. Non-verbal Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar
This section describes the leadership competency of non-verbal communication for the practice scholar. Present your understanding of the positive and negative behaviors of non-verbal communication as a leader and examples of each.
3. Written Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar
This section describes the leadership competency of written communication for the DNP practice scholar. Include your understanding of (a) professional tone & style,

(b) use of standard English,
and

(c) strategies for effective writing as a DNP leader in documents such as emails, memos, curricula vitarum, grant proposals, white papers, poster presentations, project dissemination manuscripts, and other formal written forms of professional leadership communication
Conclusion
Recap the paper’s purpose statement and mini-outline criteria.

 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Population Health Improvement Plan

  • Develop a population health improvement plan, based on your evaluation of the best available demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data, that focuses on your diagnosis of a widespread population health issue.
    Part of effectively engaging in evidence-based practice is the ability to synthesize raw health data with research studies and other relevant information in the literature. This will enable you to develop sound interventions, initiatives, and outcomes to address health concerns that you find in data during the course of your practice.
  • evaluate community demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data to diagnose a widespread population health issue, which will be the focus of a health improvement plan that you develop.
    Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.

    • Evaluate community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data to diagnose widespread population health issues.
    • Develop an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community.
  • Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
    • Propose criteria for evaluating population health improvement plan outcomes.
  • Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
    • Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.
  • Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
    • Develop a strategy for communicating with colleagues and members of the community in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
    • As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
      Recall an experience you have had working with a population, or as part of a community health improvement initiative, or a time in your care setting that you observed this type of work within your organization or community.
  • How were data and information about the community incorporated into the work?
    • Was the diversity of culture and beliefs in the community taken into account?
    • Were other, secondary, health concerns of the community also taken into account?
    • Were the economic and daily environmental realities of the community taken into account?
  • What, if any, ethical issues were considered in working with specific groups and stakeholders in the community?
  • What suggestions might you offer for doing things differently, if you could revisit that work?
    • Would you set different goals?
  • What evidence would you present to support your recommendations?

●     Resource

●     The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6011 – Evidence-Based Practice for Patient-Centered Care and Population Health Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.
Evidence-Based Practice

  • SHOW LESS
  • Triple Aim
  • Research Guides
  • Assessment Instructions
    Preparation
    Your organization is undertaking a population health improvement initiative focused on one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the local community. Examples of health improvement initiatives include nationwide concerns, such as type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and Zika. However, your organization has asked you to determine which widespread health concern should be addressed in a population health improvement plan for the community in which you practice and has entrusted you with gathering and evaluating the relevant data.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Data Evaluation

Evaluate community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data.

  • Identify the relevant data.
  • Describe the major community health concerns suggested by the data.
  • Explain how environmental factors affect the health of community residents.
Health Improvement Plan

Develop an ethical health improvement plan that effectively addresses the population health concern that you identified in your evaluation of the relevant data.

  • Base your plan on the best available evidence from a minimum of 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources.
    • Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.
    • Attach a reference list to your plan.
  • Ensure that your plan meets the cultural and environmental needs of your community and will likely lead to some improvement in the community’s health related to this concern.
    • Consider the environmental realities and challenges that exist in the community.
    • Address potential barriers or misunderstandings related to the various cultures prevalent in the community.
  • Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your plan.
    • Explain why the evidence is valuable and relevant to the community health concern you are addressing.
    • Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate and informs the goal of improving the health of the community.
  • Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes of your plan.
    • Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
  • Explain how you will communicate with colleagues and members of the community, in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way, with regard to the development and implementation of your plan.
    • Develop a clear communications strategy mindful of the cultural and ethical expectations of colleagues and community members regarding data privacy.
    • Ensure that your strategy enables you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to members of the community, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

Evaluates community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data to diagnose widespread population health issues

  • Develops an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community.
  • Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.
  • Proposes criteria for evaluating population health improvement plan outcomes.
  • Develops a strategy for communicating with colleagues and members of the community in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.
  • Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) / NEW Aged Care Quality Standards Assignment

Instructions

Format: Written
Length: 1200 – 1500 words
Curriculum Mode: Report
Rationale:
It is essential when working as a Health Professional that you have a clear understanding of the legislative frameworks that are relevant to your workplace and industry. The National Disability  Insurance Scheme and the Aged Care Quality Standards are two frameworks that you are likely to work within during your professional life. This assessment task enables you to develop an understanding of one of the frameworks and to explore how the framework applies in practice.
Task
Students are required to write a report on one of these two main frameworks that are central to working within Aged Care and Disability Services. You can choose to write your report on either the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) or the NEW Aged Care Quality Standards. The word limit is 1500 words. The report must include the following:
Introduction (approx. 200 words): this section (one paragraph) provides a context for the assignment by introducing the topic, presenting the reasons for selecting the framework to be discussed, stating the purpose of the assignment and providing a structure for the assignment.
Body (approx. 1100 words):

this section should cover the following:
Explanation of what the framework is and what it involves.
Who the framework affects?
What are the desired outcomes of the framework for clients, staff and other stakeholders?
How the framework is monitored?
Where does therapeutic recreation fit within the framework

Conclusion (approx. 200 words):

this is the last paragraph of your report. In this paragraph you need to summarise the main points of the report and make a concluding statement of its relevance to TR
References (not included in the word count): List all sources used in your report. Please use APA style when completing this list

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Disorder of Joints. Joint Disorders

Disorder of Joints. Joint Disorders

There are many disorders associated with our Joints. Some of these disorders are genetic in origin while others result from injuries or overuse. Choose ONE of the disorders below and write a brief description for each of these categories as it pertains to the disease you choose:

  • Pathophysiology – how does the disorder affect the body
  • Etiology – when does the disorder first show up and how does it progress
  • Signs and Symptoms – how does the disorder manifest itself (Note: signs and symptoms are
    NOT the same!)
  • Diagnostic Tools – how do doctors diagnose this disorder
  • Treatment Options – how is the disorder managed
  • Disorders to choose from (unless there is something you would rather research):
    Osteoarthritis
    Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Gout
    Ankylosing Spondylitis
    Writing Requirements:
    APA essay format with proper paragraphs and punctuation.
    Minimum of two scholarly resources (No Wickipedia!)
    Less than 10% can be direct quotations
    No word minimum but answers need to be thorough

 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Social determinants of health in diabetes (Case Study)

Social determinants of health in diabetes (Case Study)

Instruction

To prepare:
Review the “Social Determinants of Health” article in this week’s Learning Resources.Use the  Library to locate a scholarly article (no older than 3 years of publication) that evaluates social determinants of health in relation to a health issue.Focus on the data sources used and data collection methods employed for the study found in the scholarly article you selected. For this Assignment, write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

Provide the APA citation for the study you selected.

Identify the research question for the study  you selected.

Explain, in your own words, the purpose of the study.

Identify what type of study design was used by the researchers who published your study.

Explain, in your own words, what the researcher’s rationale was for using this study design.

If a rationale is not provided, explain what you believe is the rationale.

Identify the health condition(s) the researchers studied.Identify the independent variable(s) the researcher(s) investigated.

Explain how the independent variables you identified relate to the five key domains of the social determinants of health, as well as any other variables they assessed.

Describe in detail the participants of the study and the selection criteria.

Explain the type(s) of data and the method(s) that were used to collect the data for the study.

Explain how the social determinants of health were measured.

Identify the sources and types of bias that may have occurred based on the sample and the data required for analysis.

Explain the type of analysis that the researches used to determine the association between exposure(s) and health outcome(s).

Explain the results of the study in your own words.

Identify the more significant findings, including the measures of association (based on the study design).

Explain, in your own words, the conclusions of the study.

Identify at least one recent news event that relates to the health issue the study addressed.

Explain, in your own words, the practical applications that the research study has for the field of epidemiology.Propose (http://epidemiology.Propose) at least two recommendations you have for future research, based on the findings of this study.

Note: Your Assignment should be 2–3 pages in length with in-text citations and references. Be sure to support your work
with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources. Ensure that your in-text
citations and references are in APA format

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Foundations of Safety – Creating Public Announcement

Foundations of Safety – Creating Public  Announcement

Directions:

You will develop a public service announcement for one of the safety-related topics we have covered this semester. The 9 topics you may choose from are 1-fire safety, 2-electrical safety, 3-firearm safety, 4-law enforcement interaction, 5-auto and pedestrian safety, 6-natural disasters, 7-environmental safety, 8-interpersonal violence, and 9-sexual violence. Choose one of the topics and develop a 90 WORD public service announcement using what you have learned. Before writing the 90 word public service announcement, follow this template for the background of the public service announcement.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Social Determinants of Health in KSA

Social Determinants of Health in Saudi Arabia

Required

In 4-5 pages, discuss the social determinants of health in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Format your paper in APA style 6th edition. Use 2-3 scholarly sources.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Medication Errors Reduction. Reduction of Medicatioon Errors

Medication Errors Reduction. Reduction of Medicatioon Errors

This week, you will submit summaries of quantitative and qualitative studies. The purpose of this
assignment is to become familiar with published research, research designs, and methodologies.
For the assignment, you will select one quantitative research study and one qualitative study
related to the field of nursing and write a summary of each study. Each summary must be
accurate, succinct, and clear. These articles should be somewhat related to your PICOT
questions which is the following. please pick one but if it is too hard pick something close to
medication errors reduction
1) For nurse administering medication, (P) will implementing a “ Quiet zone” (I) as compared to
no intervention (C) reduce interruptions and distractions, decrease medication errors and
improve medication safety (O) during the 9am medication pass time (T)?.
2)For nurses who works in emergency department administering high-risk medications such as

insulin or heparin (P), will practicing double-checking (I) , as compared to giving those
medications without double-checking (C), reduced medication errors (O) while patients are in the
E.D (T)?”.
3)In patient over 65 years old (P), will practicing medication conciliation by asking the patient to
bring a bag of all their medication including herbal and over the counter drugs (I), as compared to
usual care by just asking questions ( C ) reduce medications errors (O) while patient are
hospitalized (T)?
Ensure the following questions are addressed in each summary:
1. What type of research is it (quantitative, qualitative, and design)?
2. What was the research question(s) or hypothesis?
3. What is the sample, the sample size, and sample attributes?
4. What was the setting of the study?
5. What were the researcher’s findings? (Identify one.)
You must submit the research study articles along with your summaries.
Each summary should be between 150–250 words.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources.
For the Quantitative and Qualitative Abstract Assignment (due week 4) you should:

Select a topic in nursing or medicine
Select one original research article that is quantitative and one which is qualitative. NOTE: The
articles should not be a mixed-method, review article, a meta-analysis, a Meta-synthesis or a
systematic review.
Summarize the articles
Both abstracts should be combined into one single Word document.
For a manuscript to be considered an original research article, the following conditions need to
be met:
It should be written by the researchers who actually conducted the study.
It should include the hypothesis or research question, the purpose of the study, and the details of
the research methods.
The research findings should be reported.
These findings should be interpreted and possible implications discussed.
Your paper should include:
A title page
Body
Reference page listing your sources

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Cost-Benefit Analysis in Healthcare

Cost-Benefit Analysis in Healthcare

Preparation

Scenario

Suppose an issue has emerged in your organization that presents significant risks to the stakeholders involved. Your supervisor has asked you to conduct a CBA, make a recommendation, and present it to the board of directors. You are expected to consider the numbers within the context of the organizational mission, strategic direction, patient safety, risk-management issues, regulatory requirements, patient and stakeholder satisfaction, and the dynamics within the health care industry.

Select a relevant issue within your workplace (or one from the Suggested Resources) for which a CBA may be conducted. The CBA should include one of the following course-related topics:

  • Patient safety.
  • Risk management.
  • Regulatory standards.
  • Patient and stakeholder satisfaction.

Instructions

Step One: Identify Costs

Apply the process from Writing a Cost-Benefit Analysis article (from the Required Resources) to identify costs:

  1. Make a list of all monetary costs that will be incurred upon implementation and throughout the life of the project. These include start-up fees, licenses, production materials, payroll expenses, user acceptance processes, training, and travel expenses, among others.
  2. Make a list of all non-monetary costs that are likely to be absorbed. These include time, low production of other tasks, imperfect processes, potential risks, market saturation or penetration uncertainties, and influences on one’s reputation.
  3. Assign monetary values to the costs identified in steps one and two. To ensure equality across time, monetary values are stated in present value terms. If realistic cost values cannot be readily evaluated, consult with market trends and industry surveys for comparable implementation costs in similar businesses.
  4. Add all anticipated costs together to get a total costs value (Plowman, 2014).

Step Two: Identify Benefits

Continuing with the CBA, proceed with the identification and quantification of benefits, per Writing a Cost-Benefit Analysis article.

  1. Make a list of all monetary benefits that will be experienced upon implementation and thereafter. These benefits include direct profits from products or services, increased contributions from investors, decreased production costs due to improved and standardized processes, and increased production capabilities, among others.
  2. Make a list of all non-monetary benefits that one is likely to experience. These include decreased production times, increased reliability and durability, greater customer base, greater market saturation, greater customer satisfaction, and improved company or project reputation, among others.
  3. Assign monetary values to the benefits identified in steps one and two. Be sure to state these monetary values in present value terms as well.
  4. Add all anticipated benefits together to get a total benefits value (Plowman, 2014).

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Enter the cost and benefit data you developed for the CBA in your preparation steps into the Cost-Benefit Analysis Template, linked in the Required Resources.

Then, write an analysis in which you do the following:

  • Describe the organizational, program, or departmental issue for which you have created the CBA.
  • Evaluate the cost versus benefit according to the general guidelines outlined by Plowman’s 2014 article, which you read in the preparation for this assessment.
  • Make a recommendation as to whether the benefits are sufficient to outweigh the costs of the proceeding.
  • Describe the systems-based context for your recommendations, integrating the CBA within the organization as a whole.
  • Describe how the issue relates to the organization’s vision, mission, and strategic direction.
  • Provide a rationale that explains how your recommendations are appropriate for your organization’s capacity and strategy.

Your analysis should use proper APA style and formatting and include the following sections. Each section, except the title page, should include the appropriate section heading.

  1. Title page: Use APA formatting and include the following:
    • Assessment number (Assessment 3).
    • Your name.
    • The date.
    • The course number
    • Your instructor’s name.
  2. Abstract: Include a one-paragraph summary of analysis content. This is not an introduction to the topic, but a summary of the entire analysis. Make sure to double-space.
  3. Issue description.
  4. CBA evaluation.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount