Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide. This is a Synthesis Essay/ Research paper using multiple credible sources and incorporating a position within the essay. Quotes have to be used from each source not paraphrased but the exact wording from the source. Here are the sources that need to be used. 1. Voluntary Active Euthanasia by Dan Brock The Hastings Center Report vol 22 No2 pp 10-22 2. Timothy Quill Sounding Board Death and Dignity A case of Individualized Decision Making. 3. Medical News Today What are euthanasia and assisted suicide. Medically reviewed by Timothy J Legg phd psd written by Yvette Brazier 12/2018. 4. The Atlantic Whose Right to die? By Ezekiel J. Emanuel. 5. I’m the Doctor who is here to help you die by Katie Engelhart
The paper has to be debatable. Please use these resources for the paper only. A side has to be taken.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Interventional Radiography Modality

The research assignment paper must address (but are not limited to) the following objectives:

• History of the modality selected including the most current generation of the modality
• At least two to three pathologies/conditions/ traumas that are best demonstrated by this modality and why the modality is chosen to assess a pathology or condition or trauma
• Include a brief description of the pathologies/conditions or traumas being highlighted based on modality chosen
• Accurate explanation of the components of the equipment, how images are produced and a basic overview of the modality
• Patient education- how to best explain the modality in a manner that a patient will comprehend. This should include:
• explanation of the type of energy used (radioactive energy or ultrasound waves or magnetic energy or combination of particulate radiation and ionizing radiation etc) and the impact or lack of impact on the human body from this energy
• As part of the patient education component of this paper, explaining the process of what the patient will be experience and addressing the potential side effects should be included as well as contraindications.
• A description of how the procedures are performed, if contrast is used, number and type of images produced.
• Radiographic findings of the pathology
• The submitted paper should be 4-8 pages, double-spaced, 12 font size plus a reference page. The cover page and reference page do not count as part of the required number of pages.

Students MUST use at least three literary references.

Reference page should include:

Author(s) last name, Name of Book, Article, Year and date, publisher

Suggestions and hints on how to organize your paper.
• Pick a modality or specific conditions/pathology that interests you.
• Divide your paper into sections (for example):

Introduction
History of modality
Pathologies/Conditions/trauma (at least two) with descriptions
etc

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Value of a culture of excellence and leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence within your particular MSN specialty

Value of a culture of excellence and leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence within your particular MSN specialty

Part II: Written Paper
1. In a three- to four- page paper, address the elements below. Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, to support your work. See the rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the paper.
a. Provide an introduction to the paper.
b. Discuss the characteristics of a culture of excellence.
c. Present the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization, and explain the interrelationships between each element in the concept map. Describe how the mission, vision, and values do or do not support a culture of excellence.
d. Discuss the application of two specific leadership strategies that promote a culture of excellence, and how they support the Chamberlain Care Model®.
e. Provide a conclusion to the paper.
Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
2. Part II: Using Microsoft Word 2013, create the written paper for this assignment. Include a title page with your name, date, and course information, as well as a reference page.
a. The paper (excluding title and reference pages) should be three to four pages in length.
b. A minimum of four peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are required.
c. Sources older than 5 years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
d. Only one short quote (15 words or less) may be used within the body of your writing.
e. Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.
f. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (current edition).
g. First-person may only be used in the self-reflection portion of the assignment (see Conclusion section for criteria).

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

For or Against Euthanasia Argue Argumentative Essay

For or Against Euthanasia Argue Argumentative Essay. Euthanasia is also mercy killing. You are being asked to write a 5-7 page essay, fully documented and supported by a minimum of five quality sources, on an issue for which there is a reasonable debate. Possible
issues may include, but are not limited to, the Dream Act, the death penalty, transgender rights,
health care reform, etc. The key criterion here is focus; you cannot argue for creationism over
evolution, for example, as this is too general. You may argue for teaching creationism alongside
evolution in public schools because there is adequate focus for a richer, more penetrating
argument. You cannot argue for or against gun control, as that as well is too general. You may
argue for or against the degree of background checks required, or for or against extended clips, or
a specific aspect of the 2-d Amendment because there is an adequate focus.
Rules and Guidelines:
Five to seven pages, double-spaced, 12 point font, one-inch margins.
You must use a minimum of five sources with only one source (or none) coming from an
Internet website.
All documentation must be in MLA format.
All information and ideas within your paper that are not your own must be properly cited.
There must be an accurate Works Cited page at the end of the essay, and it must be
mistake-free.
No dictionaries or encyclopedia can be used as one of your five main sources. If you
have more than five sources then you can use a dictionary or encyclopedia citation.)
Direct quotes of four lines or less: no more than FOUR allowed.
Direct quotes of five lines or more: no more than TWO allowed.
Structure and Organization:
Introduce the issue by providing a brief background that defines and explains the issue or
controverSy.
2. Clearly assert your thesis.
3. Within the body of your essay remain consistent to your introduction: first to your thesis
statement, and then to the facts and assertions set forth which will support your thesis.
Continue the development of the thesis and facts with the use of quotations, paraphrases,
analyses, and summaries of your sources.
5. Summarize the counterclaims against your position and thoroughly address the
opposition:
a) identify the opposition
b)
acknowledge the opposition
c)
anticipate what the opposition might argue against any point of yours
d) refute the opposition
6.
Do not “sit on the fence.” Take a stand!
7. State claims that support your thesis and refute the counterclaims.
8. Provide evidence for each claim your essay makes and explain the significance of that evidence.
9. Avoid logical fallacies
10. Make sure that each paragraph of your essay contains a topic sentence relating to the paragraph for your thesis statement
11. Avoid using personal pronouns ‘ I’ or “me they may be used in the concluding paragraph if needed
12. Conclude by restating your thesis now synthesizing your claims into a concise summary of your case. Do not introduce anything new in your conclusion.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Transitional care from SNF to Home

You must include the following:
Title slide: introduce your project and yourself – notes should also welcome guests
Identified problem slide: identifies the clinical issue you will address, must contain supporting internal data – notes discuss the bulleted content
Demographics slide: identifies the populations targeted to benefit from the intervention, to conduct the intervention, and the setting for your project – details should be provided for each of the 3 – notes should reflect content
Background slide(s): contains external data that supports the problem with cited references – notes discuss bulleted content and for cited evidence, provide discussion of the type of evidence with acknowledgment of the authors
Evidence Appraisal Summary: You will use your Evidence Appraisal Worksheets to summarize the evidence you have gathered for your project. Include the main points of how the evidence supports the problem and the intervention for the problem.
AIM Statement slide: contains only the statement with proper formatting
Stakeholders slide: identifies key stakeholders – notes discuss the stake they have in the proposed change
Reference slide(s): contains a list of cited sources in APA format
Narrative notes must be included for every slide in the notes section of the slide. They should read as a scriipt to discuss the slide content. They do not need to contain citations or quotations. Be sure you are citing on your slides to show where you are using the information from your references.
This first draft should be from 7-8 slides in length. See the attached Power Point for a visual example of expectations for slide appearance and notes.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

After Mr. B’s assessment is completed, Nurse J informs Dr. T,

After Mr. B’s assessment is completed, Nurse J informs Dr. T, the ED physician, of admission findings, and Dr.
T proceeds to examine Mr. B. Staffing on this day consists of two nurses (one RN and one LPN), one secretary, and one emergency
department physician. Respiratory therapy is in-house and available as needed. At the time of Mr. B’s arrival,
the ED staff is caring for two other patients. One patient is a 43-year-old female complaining of a throbbing
headache. The patient rates current pain at 4 out of 10 on numerical verbal pain scale. The patient states that
she has a history of migraines, She received treatment, remains stable, and discharge is pending. The second
patient is an eight-year-old boy being evaluated for possible appendicitis. Laboratory results are pending for
this patient. Both of these patients were examined, evaluated, and cared for by Dr. T and are awaiting further
treatment or orders

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

RCA and FMEA In Hospital

After Mr. B’s assessment is completed, Nurse J informs Dr. T, the ED physician, of admission findings, and Dr.
T proceeds to examine Mr. B. Staffing on this day consists of two nurses (one RN and one LPN), one secretary, and one emergency
department physician. Respiratory therapy is in-house and available as needed. At the time of Mr. B’s arrival,
the ED staff is caring for two other patients. One patient is a 43-year-old female complaining of a throbbing
headache. The patient rates current pain at 4 out of 10 on numerical verbal pain scale. The patient states that
she has a history of migraines, She received treatment, remains stable, and discharge is pending. The second
patient is an eight-year-old boy being evaluated for possible appendicitis. Laboratory results are pending for
this patient. Both of these patients were examined, evaluated, and cared for by Dr. T and are awaiting further
treatment or orders

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Evaluation of EBP theory Evidence Based Practice

In Week 7, students will create a PowerPoint slide show with notes pages to evaluate the use of a theory for an EBP issue or concern. In Week 8, students will create a recording of the presentation for the Peer Discussion thread.
Criteria for Content
Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected nurse practitioner specialty.
Select a theory or theoretical model which is relevant to your nurse practitioner specialty and would offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.
In a PowerPoint Presentation, address the following.
Introduction to the presentation
Identify and describe a theory or theoretical model, and explain its relevance to your nurse practitioner specialty.
Describe an issue or concern that is related to your nurse practitioner specialty, and explain its impact on health care outcomes
Explain how the theory or theoretical model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or theoretical model.
Conclusion to the presentation
References
Preparing the presentation
Submission Requirements
Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create the presentation. Submit as a .ppt or .pptx file.
Length: The PowerPoint presentation must be 6-8 total slides (excluding title and reference slides).
Speaker notes should be used and include in-text citations when applicable. Use the Notes Page view feature in PowerPoint to include speaker notes in the
file.
A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature sources must be used.
Submission: Submit your PowerPoint file to the Week 7 Dropbox.
Best Practices in Preparing the Presentation
The following are best practices in preparing this presentation:
Review directions thoroughly.
Follow submission requirements.
Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Review the Creating a Professional Presentation located in Course Resources.
Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature sources must be used. A minimum of 3 scholarly references are used. References should be published within the past 5 years. A primary source (original theory or writings from theorist) may be used, and primary sources may be older than 5 years. Textbooks are not considered scholarly resources.
Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Drew Pritchard (98) & his sister Lily Simpson (86) and her grandson Jack Simpson (15)

Drew Pritchard (98) & his sister Lily Simpson (86) and her grandson Jack Simpson (15)
Drew Pritchard is a 98-year-old gentleman who was admitted to your ward 4 weeks ago following a Left-sided Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA). He has had a mild CVA in the past and some evidence of Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs) but was managing at home with help of one carer twice a day and support of his family.
He has a long-term history of Asthma and still uses inhalers. No documented issues of concerns around asthma whilst in hospital. He has had one treated chest infections but that was over 2 years ago. He has been troubled by constipation in the past and he was taking Laxido sachets for this prior to admission. He has had recorded episodes of faecal incontinence whilst in hospital.
Drew has been assessed by Speech and Language Team (SALT) and they have documented that they are satisfied that he is not suffering with dysphagia. But have recommended a soft diet. Whilst in hospital Drew the staff report Drew has needed prompting to eat his meals and drink fluids this has needed monitoring as well as ensuring the position of the utensils so that Drew can manage to use his left hand. He has lost 2 kilograms in 4 weeks. He has been prescribed Ensure supplements twice daily by Dietician. His BMI is currently 20.5. He has managed to take medication in liquid form and there is no evidence of Drew refusing medication.
Drew has had some speech difficulties that he is working on with SALT he was using a picture board on admission to hospital but has been able to verbalize but can be incoherent particularly when Drew is tired. The nurses who know Drew best feel that they can understand his needs through his non-verbal cues. Sometimes it can take quite a while to assess through feedback whether Drew has understood the information given to him.
Drew can become anxious when he feels he is not being understood and needs reassurance from the staff, is making basic choices and give consent using his picture board and his skills with communication. He has some difficulties remembering when tired. Staff are concerned that it may be hard to assess if Drew can make more complex decisions due to his difficulty communicating. He will often nod as though he understands but is not relay information back. It is difficult to assess Drew memory due to communication difficulties.
This recent CVA has resulted in a deterioration in Drews mobility, currently he is not safe to weight-bear and will need hoisting. Drew has no recorded falls whilst in hospital.
Drew is on indwelling urinary catheter since admission to hospital this is due to the fact, he developed a category 2 pressure ulcer to his sacrum shortly after admission this is improving now. His Waterlow is 21. He is being nursed on high-risk mattress and cushion. He is being regularly repositioned.
He is now medically fit for discharge and will need a care package to support him when leaving hospital. Prior to his hospital admission he had 2 visits per day by social services to assist him in the morning and in the evening. Drew funded this care himself using money he has in savings. His care needs have changed whilst in hospital.
Prior to his recent admission he was living with his 86-year-old sister, Lily Simpson and her 15-year-old grandson, Jack Simpson. Lily suffers with Left Sided Heart Failure, following a myocardial infarction 5 years ago and is finding it increasingly difficult to cope. Jack has poor attendance at school due to frequently supporting his grandmother and great uncle Drew. His recent mock exam results resulted in several poor grades. He had hoped to study at college and become an engineer, although he is feeling low in mood and has stopped going out with his friends.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount