Category: Research Paper Help

This definition is based on the University of Arizona Global Campus (UAGC).

A thesis statement is defined as a sentence that describes the topic and purpose of a paper. Students are usually expected to write good thesis statements. However, this only comes with learning and practice. According to the UAGC website, a good thesis statement will direct the structure of your essay and will allow your reader to understand the ideas you will discuss within your paper. The thesis should be located within the opening paragraphs of a paper. Often, the thesis is written as the last sentence of the introduction. Although a thesis is usually one sentence, it can be broken into two sentences for complex subjects. The nature of a thesis statement depends on the paper one is writing: argumentative thesis statement, analytical thesis statement, and Expository Thesis Statement.

Each student will be asked to design a study. (The study should not be carried out.) The paper describing the study should be written in APA style and should contain:

1) a title page;

2) an abstract;

3) an introduction (with at least five references);

4) a method section (in which the design is explained);

5) a results section, in which mention is made of which statistic would be used to analyze the data if data were collected (but do not makeup data);

6) a brief discussion section; and

7) a references section. The report should be approximately seven pages long, though the exact length of each section will be discussed in more detail during class. Do not use websites as citations. ***Please do NOT “make up” fake results. This is a proposal of what study you would do if you were allowed, not what you have done. Thus, the abstract, methods, and results sections should be written in future tense.

Overview
You are a supervisor at Regional Call Center’s Washington, DC, facility. Regional provides contract call center services for a number of companies, including banks and major retail companies. You have been with the company for slightly more than seven years, having joined Regional right after graduating with a master’s degree in business administration from Strayer University. After the monthly staff meeting, you were handed a new assignment by the company CEO. The assignment came out of a discussion at the meeting in which one of Regional’s clients wanted a report describing the calls being handled for them by Regional. The CEO had asked you to describe the data in a file called Regional Call Center and produce a report that would both graphically and numerically analyze the data. The data are for a sample of 57 calls and for the following variables:
Account Number.
Past Due Amount.
Current Account Balance.
Nature of Call (Billing Question or Other).
Instructions
Summarize the case scenario of the Regional Call Center’s Washington, D.C. facility.
Develop bar charts showing the mean and median current account balance.
Construct a scatter diagram showing the current balance on the horizontal axis and the past due amount on the vertical axis.
Compute the key descriptive statistics for the current and past due amounts.
Repeat task 4 but compute the statistics for the past due balances.
Compute the coefficient of variation for current account balances.
Write a 4 3page report to National’s client that contains the results of the completed tasks along with a discussion of the statistics and graphs.

You are on a committee to determine if the school community would support a bond referendum to increase taxes for the school. You need to determine the “feel” of the community. Write a 1- to 2-page essay on how you would set up a sampling procedure to assess the situation. Use your local school as an example and in your writings, include responses to the following areas:
Target Population
Accessible Population
True Sample Number
Actual Sample Number
Process for implementing a true random sample representative of the school’s community
Process for implementing a stratified random sample—what categories would you include and why would they be critical to know
Process for implementing a cluster sample—how would you perform a cluster sample, what would be included and why
Be specific in your approach using citations and references to validate your justification.

Ethical researchers act in honest ways. Ethics are conduct norms or standards that distinguish between right and wrong and acceptable and unacceptable behaviors. Ethical considerations matter because they guard against the fabrication or falsification of data. They promote the pursuit of knowledge and truth, research’s primary goal. Ethical behavior is also crucial for collaborative work because it encourages an environment of trust, accountability, and mutual respect among team members. Likewise, researchers must adhere to ethical standards for the public to support and believe in the research. Although most
quality improvement and evidence-based practice projects pose minimal risk to human subjects, an IRB screening process for your capstone project is required to ensure the project is meeting the appropriate ethical standards.
The Nuremberg Code (1947) protects human rights and is the leading code for conducting ethical research. It focuses on:
Voluntary informed consent.
Freedom to withdraw from research.
Protection from physical and mental harm.
Protection from suffering and death.
It also emphasizes the risk-benefit balance of conducting research. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) underscored the importance of protecting subjects in research and strongly proclaimed that individuals’ well-being takes precedence over scientific and social interests.
Good research is well planned, appropriately designed, and ethically approved. Developing and following a research protocol helps to ensure this. Research needs to seek to answer specific questions rather than just collect data. Researchers must obtain approval from the Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee. Researchers also need to pay special attention to vulnerable subjects to avoid breach of ethical codes. Although most quality improvement and evidence-based practice projects pose minimal risk to human subjects, an IRB screening process for your capstone project is required to ensure the project is meeting the appropriate ethical standards.
The major ethical issues in conducting research usually involve:
Informed consent.
Beneficence—do no harm.
Respect for anonymity and confidentiality.
Respect for privacy.
You are responsible to ensure your project is conducted ethically and responsibly from planning to publication. Be familiar with ethical principles and follow them strictly. Discuss openly with the project team any potential ethical issues. If in doubt, consult the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for expert opinion and direction.
In this assessment, you will apply what you have learned from the CITI training and from your independent research on ethics to your doctoral project. In a 6- to 8-page paper plus a template, you will identify ethical considerations that may arise as part of your doctoral project. You will also identify strategies to address these ethical considerations.
Reference
World Medical Association General Assembly (2004). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving
human subjects. International Journal of Bioethics, 15(1), 124-9.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring
guide criteria:
Competency 2: Apply strategies to maintain a climate of mutual respect and shared values.
Apply historical ethical principles to analyze potential ethical concerns related to your doctoral project.
Determine vulnerability or possible concerns for identified project participants.
Create strategies to address potential ethical risks related to the doctoral project.
Describe the IRB processes to be completed prior to starting the data collection process.
Describe possible future changes to your doctoral project that would require IRB approval and the process to follow to obtain this approval.
Competency 4: Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Create a clear, well-organized, succinct, professional ethics analysis paper that uses an appropriate tone and is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Preparation
To successfully prepare for this assessment, you will need to conduct independent research on ethics related to research studies. You will be asked to supply a minimum of five references in your ethics analysis paper over and above those provided under suggested resources.
Rather than researching the importance of ethical practice (which of course is very important), focus your research efforts on other research studies that have been conducted that are similar to your proposed research. For example:
Can you locate other studies that took place in a setting similar to yours?
What other studies exist that used participants similar to yours?
What studies can you find that address a problem similar to yours?
Do other studies exist that used research tools similar to yours, such as surveys, questionnaires, health behavior models, performance improvement plans, et cetera?
Examine current resources available through peer-reviewed articles and professional and government websites. These guides can help you identify scholarly and authoritative sources:
Nursing Doctoral (DNP) Research Guide.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences.
For program specific guidance refer to:
DNP Doctoral Project Manual [PDF].
Programs of Research: School of Nursing and Health Sciences (NHS) [PDF].
Instructions
Note: The assessments in this course must be completed in the order presented; subsequent assessments should be built on both your earlier work and your instructor’s feedback on earlier assessments. If you choose to submit assessments prematurely, without considering and integrating your instructor’s feedback, your assessment may be returned ungraded, resulting in your loss of an assessment attempt.
As you begin work on your Ethics Analysis paper, you may find it useful to seek out free writing workshops available through the  Writing Center.
These workshops address such writing topics as: correct APA usage, paper organization, synthesis of material, and so on.
Note: Remember that this keystone course will help determine whether you are ready to proceed with your doctoral project. You will want to do everything you can to ensure that your critical thinking, research, and writing skills are at the doctoral level.
The goal in this assessment is to ensure that you have adequately identified potential ethical concerns related to your doctoral project that could impede your project’s completion, quality, and effectiveness. For any identified ethical concerns, you will need to develop strategies to appropriately address these issues. As you write your paper, please consider what you learned from CITI and from your independent research into research ethics.
For this assessment, you will write a 6- to 8-page ethics analysis paper. Include the following headings in your paper and be sure to address the bullets underneath each heading:
Introduction
In brief, what is your project about?
Who are the major stakeholders involved?
History of Research Ethics
What are the major principles in the history of research ethics?
How do autonomy, beneficence, malfeasance, and distributive justice specifically apply to your project?
Human Subjects/Participants
What human subjects/participants, if any, will be part of your project?
What are the exclusion and inclusion criteria for any people who are part of your study?
Potential Ethical Risks and Action Plans
Note: Use the Potential Ethical Risks and Action Plans Template [DOCX] to complete this portion of your paper. Submit this as a separate attachment to the assessment area.
In brief, as you completed the Potential Risks and Action Plans Template, what are the three to five major findings you discovered about potential risks and corresponding action plans or strategies related to your doctoral project?
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Processes
What are your project’s IRB approval needs?
Does your practicum site have an IRB?
What possible approval is needed at your practicum site?
What timeline will you need to follow for all IRB approvals?
What steps will you take if aspects of your study change?
What new approvals may be required to continue your project?
Conclusion
What are the key takeaways for you from the ethics analysis of your project?
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Submission length: 6-8 double-spaced pages, in addition to a title page, reference page, and completed template.
Template: Be sure to use the Potential Ethical Risks and Action Plans Template for that section of your paper.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
Citations and references: Cite a minimum of five current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your ideas. These are over and above the suggested resources for this assessment. Current means no more than five years old.
APA formatting: Follow APA formatting and style guidelines for citations and references.
For an APA refresher, consult Evidence and APA.
Note: You may find the information from this assessment useful as you complete Part 3 of your Project Charter, Ethical Considerations.

Writing research methodology or research method is vital in research for many reasons. It is in the methodology section that the researcher describes the procedures used to carry out the investigation. A well-written research methodology should make it possible to reproduce the results. Many researchers have challenges writing research methodology. One reason could be due to a lack of time to write an excellent methodology, whereas another reason could be due to lack of experience. Before writing a research methodology one should understand the crucial sections that must be included. A typical research methodology may contain research sections such as introduction, justification of research methodology, sample, sampling method used, ethical considerations, data collection methods, data analysis method, validity and reliability, limitations, and conclusion. However, these sections depend on the research being carried out. Some items may be included or excluded. We can help you write a research methodology. We have professional research writers who have been helping thousands of clients to write an excellent research methodology. If you do not know how to write a research methodology, we are here to help you. Provide us with research a section of the research proposal you have completed or just a research title. We can also help you in other sections of the research. Additionally, we can proofread your research methodology or other sections of the research paper or dissertation if you have already completed it. Place your order now and leave the rest to our professional research writers.

Research methodology or research method is a vital section of research. It is in the methodology section that the researcher describes the procedures used to carry out the investigation. A well-written research methodology should make it possible to reproduce the results. Many researchers have challenges writing research methodology. One reason could be due to a lack of time to write an excellent methodology, whereas another reason could be due to lack of experience. Before writing a research methodology one should understand the crucial sections that must be included. A typical research methodology may contain research sections such as introduction, justification of research methodology, sample, sampling method used, ethical considerations, data collection methods, data analysis method, validity and reliability, limitations, and conclusion. However, these sections depend on the research being carried out. Some items may be included or excluded. We can help you write a research methodology. We have professional research writers who have been helping thousands of clients to write an excellent research methodology. If you do not know how to write a research methodology, we are here to help you. Provide us with research a section of the research proposal you have completed or just a research title. We can also help you in other sections of the research. Additionally, we can proofread your research methodology or other sections of the research paper or dissertation if you have already completed it. Place your order now and leave the rest to our professional research writers.

After completing your survey, you now have survey data for your project. The next step is probably to analyze the survey data and interpret the results. Analysis of quantitative data can be accomplished using different types of data analysis software. One of the most common applications is analyzing quantitative data using an Excel spreadsheet. Quantitative data can be also analyzed using SPSS software. SPSS software is an advanced data analysis tool that is recommended in many institutions. But do you know how to use SPSS to analyze data? Probably not. This is because learning how to use SPSS software can take longer than a year to master all concepts. So what do you do when you are running short of time? We can help you analyze your quantitative data using SPSS or any other software of your choice. We have data analysis professionals who have several years of experience helping thousands of clients analyze their quantitative data. Get help to analyze your data using SPSS. It could be ANOVA or Regression analysis. Whatever the results you want, we are ready to deliver in time and to the highest quality you cannot get anywhere.

Your project involves the collection and analysis of data using SPSS. You have gathered data for your project and you have them in a spreadsheet or other format. You are required to analyze the data, generate tables, graphs, or charts, and then interpret the relationships between the various variables. You are required to use advanced software such as SPSS or STATA. However, you realize it takes almost a year or more to master how to use the software. You may have less than a week to carry out the analysis, complete your project, and submit it to whoever needs it. You realize you cannot submit half-completed work because it is worthless. That is where we come in. We combine over ten years of experience helping thousands of clients analyze their data using SPSS. You only need to give us your data and instructions on what to be analyzed and leave the rest to us. Our SPSS professionals who have mastered using SPSS to analyze data can deliver your project within hours. Talk to our support to get a quote of the cost before placing the order because it is not charged in terms of the number of pages. Our support will help you to give you a quote in seconds. Try our SPSS services and refer us to other clients, and you can earn huge discounts!

The background for the problem, and a problem statement. Your literature review is a narrative of 7-10 scholarly sources, synthesizing what is known about the health issue you have selected from a policy perspective. Begin the literature review with a broad overview of policies that address your health issue, then narrow the discussion to the specific policy you will be analyzing. Your background should be structured so that it goes from discussing the importance of the health issue, the gap in knowledge based on the literature regarding the health issue, and how your analysis will help to fill in this gap. Provide factual information needed to understand the problem, such as incidence/prevalence or other data, population affected, and factors or circumstances contributing
to the problem. This section is informational, not analytical, so the information provided should include facts, not opinion. For a policy analysis, the definition of the problem is structured as a problem statement.
The problem statement should define the problem to be addressed in the analysis, should be succinct (one or two sentences), and should be written in the form of a question.
Part 1 will include the following components of your project in a narrative of 2,000-2,500 words:
II. Literature Review (Begin the literature review with a broad overview of policies that address your health issue, then narrow the discussion to the specific policy you will be analyzing).
III. Background for the Problem
a. Describe why the problem has been selected.
b. Describe why the issue is important and why it needs urgent attention.
IV. Problem Statement
Part 2
This section should demonstrate a good understanding of the policy. The overview of the current policy should provide details about the policy being analyzed as well as a description of the target audience for the policy. Describe the key stakeholders who have a significant interest in the problem being addressed by the policy. The key factors, or multidisciplinary impacts, are those factors that affect stakeholder viewpoints that need to be considered when
analyzing the policy problem. These factors can include:
• Epidemiological and medical factors (e.g., what is the scope of this problem and who is affected?)
• Economic factors (e.g., what is the economic impact of addressing and of not addressing this problem?)
• Political factors (e.g., are there interest groups, political groups, or individuals who oppose change and who support change for this problem?)
• Ethical factors (e.g., are there communities or groups unfairly or disproportionately affected by this problem?)
• Legal factors (e.g., are there legal restrictions or uncertainties related to this problem?)
• Practical factors (e.g., is it realistic to solve this problem at this time?)
Part 2 will include the following components in a narrative of 1,000-1,500 words:
V. Overview of Current Policy
VI. Key Stakeholders
VII. Key Factors/Multidisciplinary Impacts
a. Epidemiological and medical factors
b. Economic factors
c. Political factors
d. Ethical factors
e. Legal factors
f. Practical factors
Part 3
Description of options for policy action and a recommendation for policy action. Describe three to five options that can be considered for addressing the problem by the audience for this policy analysis. Include a description of the positive and negative aspects or pros and cons for each option. Describe the criteria you are using to analyze the pros and cons/positives and negatives for each action. For example, criteria can include cost, feasibility or ease of implementation, legality, fairness, timeliness, or targeted impact to the audience affected by the problem. For your recommendation, you should choose one of the options you described. Describe why this option is preferred over the other options, despite the cons or negative aspects of the policy action.
Part 3 will include the following components in a narrative of 750-1,000 words:
VIII. Options for Policy Action
a. Three to five options
b. Positive and negative aspects or pros and cons of each action
c. Criteria for analyzing pros and cons for each option
IX. Recommendation
d. Description of one of the options for policy action as the recommended action
e. Description of why this option is preferred over the other options
The final capstone project should be a narrative of 4,000-6,500 words and include all required sections in the following order:
Title page
I. Executive Summary
II. Literature Review
III. Background for the Problem
a. Describe why the problem has been selected
b. Describe why the issue is important and why it needs urgent attention
IV. Problem Statement
V. Overview of Current Policy
VI. Key Stakeholders
VII. Key Factors/Multidisciplinary Impacts
a. Epidemiological and medical factors
b. Economic factors
c. Political factors
d. Ethical factors
e. Legal factors
f. Practical factors
VIII. Options for Policy Action
a. Three to five options
b. Positive and negative aspects or pros and cons of each action
c. Criteria for analyzing pros and cons for each option
IX. Recommendation
a. Description of one of the options for policy action as the recommended action
b. Description of why this option is preferred over the other options
X. Conclusion and Dissemination of Knowledge
XI. References