Category: Homework Assignment Help

Develop a project risk register using the provided risk register template. The risk register must include at least 10 project risks, both internal and external, as well as the projected response or responses to those risks. Keep in mind that you are conducting a project in a foreign country, Brazil, which itself will add some risk because the official language in Sao Paulo, Brazil is Portuguese.

You are working on a Research Paper–provide a tentative title and topic that is well-conceptualized. Then generate or produce Annotated Bibliography (AB) of about 5 recognized books and 5 articles/volume chapters (peer-reviewed journals and scholarly volumes) using newly researched secondary sources to be incorporated into your paper. A significant portion of this research should be recent and impactful in the field (e.g. should consist of top peer-reviewed academic journals and well-reviewed books published with academic presses). For each Book, each entry should consist of about a page single-spaced, and for each article or book chapter, there should be no more than 6-8 sentences. These should consist of a description or set of notes summarising the author’s main claims or argument, your assessment of the strengths/weaknesses of this, and how you envision using this source in your future research project — e.g., for which part or section of your research paper, how you see it bolstering key claims or a position that you will be representing/extending/critiquing.
You should continue to refine your AB step-by-step and if you want to apply this AB to an actual paper you are working on, all the better! Your AB should be no less than 6-8 pages.

Question: Using 4 quotations (with appropriate book and page numbers) from your reading of Plutarch’s Life of Julius Caesar and Life of Marc Antony, discuss how the portrayal of these two Roman men is similar to or different from their depictions in the film Cleopatra. Your examples must include 4 different quotations (2 for Caesar and 2 for Antony) and specific scenes in the film that we watched in class.
Your papers will be graded on the following criteria:
a) The 4 quotations you chose and how they relate to the rest of the reading of that individual’s biography. If you cannot cite 4 quotations (plus book and page numbers) with appropriate arguments, you will not receive credit. No quotations = no credit.
b) how well you can connect the 4 quotations to what you learned in this course, including the film Cleopatra that we watched. You can also bring in comparative material from the other films.
c) the clarity and originality of your argument. This means that you must give considerable thought to your answers.
d) your writing and editing. If your responses are grammatically incorrect and/or your sentences form a “word salad”, you will not receive credit. For this reason, it is a good idea to not only work on this paper long before the due date, but, if you are having problems, to use the Writing Center before you submit it.
• Please note that no points will be awarded if this final exam is less than 3 pages. Also, plagiarism of any kind will result in a grade of F for the course and appropriate disciplinary action as stipulated by the university.
• Please also note that I will not read your paper before the due date since by now you already have the necessary background from the course (the relevant
PowerPoint presentations can be found on BB). You also have over two weeks to complete this assignment so any help you may need with it should be addressed to the Writing Center.
• Late submissions will not be accepted and will result in a grade of F for the final exam.
Please write this well, my professor is a tough grader, cite quotes correctly. Please read the above carefully and follow step by step .

The final paper will focus on Braveheart and The Outlaw King OR The Kingdom of Heaven (though other films assigned in class may be used and are encouraged to be used for this paper). The articles and books provided will help you answer the prompt.

Prompt: This paper is more open than previous papers but the central idea your paper must examine is what draws modern day filmmakers and audiences to the medieval world (with a focus on film) and WHY (don’t just say to entertain or make money; truly try to examine and analyze this draw). To help with this prompt, make sure to read the provided articles on medievalism. You can discuss one or multiple aspects that draw people to medieval-like films but you must discuss at least one specific theory as drawn from the assigned readings. Make sure to use essay format, with a thesis, a body of evidence drawn from the movies as well as your textbooks and articles, and a conclusion.

To achieve full points your paper must include:

One-inch margins, 12 font, a cover page, double spaced, and page numbers located in the upper right corner
FOUR to SIX pages (a FULL four pages, not 3 ½) – the six pages are not a limit, merely a suggestion
Be thesis driven
At least TWO outside academic works (books or journal articles that are academic in nature)
At least FOUR works assigned in class, either the books or articles assigned
A bibliography. Make sure you include the films in the bibliography
Use footnotes, NOT endnotes.
I would like the bibliography and Citations to be in Chicago style- use the following link to help with Chicago: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/717/01/ (Links to an external site.). Use footnotes, not endnotes.

Great Depression and New Deal

Read and listen: Dubofsky and Dulles, chapters 13-16 and 17 (pp. 286-292);

Dorothea Lange’s “Migrant Mother” Photographs in the Farm Security Administration Collection, Library of Congress, https://guides.loc.gov/migrant-mother

“Protecting Workers by Supporting Unions: National Labor Relations Act, 1935, Wagner Act,” in Mario R. DiNunzio, Documents Decoded: The Great Depression and New Deal, pp. 191-196,

Read at least 3 life histories of Americans during the Great Depression, in “American Life Histories: Manuscripts from the Federal Writer’s Project, 1936-1939,” https://www.loc.gov/collections/federal-writers-project/articles-and-essays/rank-and-file/

FDR speech on the eve of the 1936 election, 31 October 1936, at Madison Square Garden: https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/october-31-1936-speech-madison-square-garden

1936 presidential election map by county: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1936_United_States_presidential_election#/media/File:PresidentialCounty1936Colorbrewer.gif
Write: How did the Second New Deal and the CIO address workers needs in the mid-1930s and what were the political outcomes of this alliance between the Democratic Party and the industrial union movement?

For whichever prompt you choose, make sure that you do all three of the following:
1. Briefly explain:
(A) your position (or the author’s position, depending on the question) (B) your (or their) argument for that position.
2. Research, and briefly explain a counter-argument to that argument / position (whatever you consider to be the strongest counter-argument against it).
3. Give your own reasoned analysis of this debate, in which you:
(A) state clearly which side you believe has the better argument, (B) explain why that side has the better argument, and
(C) explain what error the other side has made in their argument.
Also, for university requirements, you need to cite a minimum of 5 scholarly sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles, books, etc.) It is often easiest to include these in the counter-argument, but depends on the details of your essay.
the prompt is over John Locke: His reasoning for concluding that the concept of “substance” is the concept of a
“something I know not what.”

Imagine you are a business analytics employee at BAT Car Company. The president and CEO of BAT have tasked you with providing them with a data plan addressing expansion of BAT’s production business into Frankfurt, Germany, on a $40 million Model Z plant. This $40 million, which encompasses all fixed costs, the BAT CEO plans to apportion equally (25%) each) among the four types of vehicles the Model Z plant will manufacture.
All economic and environmental impact studies have been approved. The size of the plant is predicted to be 420 soccer fields in size (a soccer field is 100 yards wide by 130 yards long). The car sales are expected to be: $30,000 per sedan; $50,000 per sports model; $20,000 per small cargo van; and $40,000 per passenger minivan. It will create 10,000 jobs for Frankfurt and the surrounding areas.
There have been some issues with protestors regarding the building of an automotive plant that destroys forestland valued at $350 million. There has been some rumbling regarding a group called “Save The Forest” that could implement a cease all actions lawsuit against BAT. Research has shown that previous lawsuits and environmental impact has led to years of litigation and legal fees. The variable costs for the first year’s operation look to be $20,000 per sedan; $40,000 per sports model; $10,000 per small cargo van; and $25,000 per passenger minivan. Sales are expected to be: 40,000 sedans; 5,000 sports cars; 2,000 cargo vans; and 12,000 minivans.
Prepare a brief report for the president and CEO of BAT Car Company. Your report should include the following elements:

an introduction section that describes how the quantitative analysis approach can be applied to this situation;
BAT’s profit formula results;
BAT’s break-even point for each vehicle type; and
your final recommendation on actions to take. (This section should convey to the CEO if the expansion of the production plant is profitable to BAT over the long haul, as well as how to deal with any possible litigation.)

Your final report must be at least three pages in length, and you must show all of your computations.
You should use at least two academic sources in your report, one of which may be your textbook. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used.

Briefly describe the content of teachers ‘professional ethics and reason on the basis of the course literature on how and for what reasons teachers’ professional ethics can be challenged in the teacher’s everyday work.

Essay must have cover page, abstract, narrative/body of the paper.

1. Define the problem related to your topic: What are current issues or concerns related to the issue you wish to discuss. You want to introduce the topic to the reader as if they do not have any knowledge of this topic.
2. Literature Review: What has been written in the literature on this topic? Please contact Lee Adams from the campus library. She can assist you with the location of academic journal articles and other resources. This section should be organized by theme and not a list of each article.
3. What are Possible Solutions?: What are underlying concerns that have resulted in the issue you discuss? What are possible solutions to improving in this area. In this section you might states solutions and provide examples from currently running programs. Make sure you have a strong opening paragraph. Does it clearly highlight what you indent to discuss in the paper?
Keep the writing simple and clear. You want to avoid relying too much on a thesaurus.
Use an active voice instead of a passive voice
Be clear and concise. You want to avoid fluff or redundancy.

Reading Response Papers. These responses are short (200-300 words) discussions of one of the assigned readings (see below for details). Reading responses will be graded by a rubric that will be made available on D2L. The reading response should NOT just be a summary of the reading or a review of relevant literature. Instead, the reading response MUST include one of the following elements:

1. Clarification: The author claims p, but I don’t know what is meant by saying p. Here are some suggestions for what “p” might mean.

2. Argument: The author claims p. I think I know what is meant by p. But why does the author claim p? What is the argument for p?

3. Objection: The author claims p and offers an argument for p. But I think that p is problematic. Here’s my objection to p (or to the author’s argument for p): q. What might the author say in response to q?

4. Assistance: The author claims p. I agree with the author that p, but I think the following additional reason (which the author doesn’t mention) can be given in support of p: q

5. Suggestion of parallels: The author claims p. P (or your argument for p) reminds me of so-and-so’s claim that q (or their argument for q).