Read chapters 18 – 20. Watch short Matthieu Ricard video: The Secret to Happiness, watch empathy video: Roots of Empathy, and watch Alain de Botton video: Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person
Two-page reflection paper (using APA format, but it does not need an abstract or title page. It will need one quote from the source material cited correctly, with a reference list).
Read the article attached and give your personal reaction to the paper and what makes marriage work
MLA style formatting
2-3 pages long
Identify alternative policies. In order to reach this third step, the other two must have been successfully reached and completed. As it can be seen, the policy analysis involves an incrementalist approach; reaching one step in order to go on to the next. In this third step understanding what is sought is very important. In order to generate alternatives, it becomes important to have a clear understanding of the problem and how to go about it. Possible alternatives include the “do-nothing approach” (status quo), and any other that can benefit the outcome. Combining alternatives generates better solutions not thought of before. Relying on past experiences from other groups or policy analysis helps to create a more thorough analysis and understanding. It is important to avoid
settling prematurely on a certain number of options in this step; many options must be considered before settling into a reduced number of alternatives.
Brainstorming, research, experiments, writing scenarios, or concept mapping (Links to an external site.) greatly help in finding new alternatives that will help reach an “optimal” solution in healthcare
Based on the ideas and approach followed by Carl V. Patton Harassment and retaliation policy
Which countries are the most competitive in the global economy?
Which are the least competitive?
How do countries at the bottom move up to the middle-ranking?
The project should be at least 12-15 double-spaced pages, including graphs and tables, but not including a title page and works cited.
Be sure there are appropriate internal citations and that the paper is well edited.
The world economic forum is a good source to use.
Argue about the permissibility of same-sex marriage. Your paper is to bring to bear a historical perspective and a feminist perspective on your arguments. In other words, if you argue against allowing same sex marriage, then you need to use one of the historical perspectives as your support, and you need to acknowledge and defend your view against a feminist critique. Again, you may use the historical and feminist perspective of your choice (but you save time using what you have written before). You are also to include the ideas found in lectures and readings on homosexuality & marriage.
This is not a research paper in the sense that you go out and find your own sources. Rather, your research is done within the confines of the texts provided—there is more than enough in what I have posted to write this paper. (You only need source the fact that you obtained the quote from a particular reading. You need not worry about the page number or the publication information—I have all of that on file and you will not be graded on the unorthodox citations for this project.).
While your paper is in essence your own arguments about the issues surrounding same sex marriage, but it is not an exercise in purely subjective attitudes.
You begin by stating your opinion (I will argue that … ) but the rest of your paper is spent giving explanations, reasons, justifications, and defences of that opinion, using the ideas of others to back up your claims. I want you to insert quotes from the authors you utilize in your paper, taken from the readings. One to two short quotes per page of your essay is about average
The paper invites you to pursue a comparative examination of the classical thinkers of our course, whose theories of conflict and change played a decisive role in the formation of contemporary culture, art, and politics. As much as their methods vary, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud meet in a shared critique (or, “hermeneutics of suspicion”) of self, value and society. But they also diverge in their analytical categories, critical methods, and theoretical vocabulary: historical materialism, post-metaphysical philosophy, and theory of the unconscious, respectively. In your paper, therefore, you are expected to articulate points of contrast as well as convergence in their writings from a specific lens. Your paper should critically discuss the value and limits of each of these thinkers’ methods of critique, and their respective diagnoses of modern culture and society.
Surrounding the theme of religion, this paper is a comparative analysis of religion from the three thinkers’ perspectives. I will upload an outline, and the draft corrected by the instructor. Please use only the sources I’ve uploaded.
Your research paper is to be written following APA (American Psychological Association) guidelines. The paper must be typed, double-spaced on standard-sized paper (8.5×11 inches) with margins of one inch on all sides. It should have a minimum of 1,250 words (usually 4-5 pages), excluding the title page, abstract, and reference page. While APA standards allow similar fonts, my requirement is Times Roman with size 12 font. The paper is to be typed in Microsoft Word. You cannot submit your paper using Microsoft Works, Corel Word Perfect, or as a “pdf” document.
A minimum of three references is required and will be listed on your reference page. Your references should come from one of the approved research journals (see attached list), book publications, and documented articles. Only one internet resource is acceptable as long as it is properly referenced. Any references from the online Wikipedia will not be accepted.
Your paper will be graded on ten areas:
Title Page
Abstract
Introduction
Body or Discussion
Conclusion
References
Organization
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling
APA Format
Paper Length
In summary, format, reintroduce your organization, the ethical dilemma, and the philosophical principles and obligations that you discussed in your first Application.
➢ For leaders to lead an ethical organization, they must beware of—and understand how to—use both internal and external controls. Discuss both types of controls that are at the disposal of your organization’s leadership, citing the Cooper text (Chapter 6).
➢ Identify current specific structures, controls, and/or policies essential to addressing the ethical dilemma upon which you are focused. For example, internally is there a hierarchical structure to your organization that can be employed to help with decision making? Is there a board to which leadership is accountable? Externally, are there legal structures that, at least in theory, should ensure ethical decisions are being made or due to weaknesses in the structures, are allowing unethical decisions?
➢ Considering what may be needed in the future. For example, what new internal structures, controls, and/or policies and procedures are required to address the ethical dilemma? (Note: Do not attempt to identify solutions to the ethical issue; rather, address the organization’s structures that can help to address the ethical dilemma.)
➢ How would you envision implementing these new structures, controls, and/or policies and procedures? What would be required to implement these changes?
➢ What needs to occur, external to the organization itself, to support the ethical decision that is needed, which you identified in your first Application?
➢ Summarize the key elements of your paper in the concluding paragraph(s).
Please include 5 pages, not including the title and references page. And please include 5 references in addition to at least 2 references to Cooper.
For this first assignment, construct a 5-7 page paper that:
a) details the ethical considerations in embarking upon a qualitative research project;
b) proposes a qualitative project via two well-written research questions (RQ) and 2-3 semi-structured interview questions for each (RQ); and
c) identifies the target populations, as well as any ethical challenges you might expect to encounter where completing such a project is concerned.
Your paper should utilize sound critical thought, liberally refer to and cite course materials, and be written in APA-format (to include a title page, abstract, properly formatted in-text citations and a reference page). Any research topic is acceptable as long as it has an application to psychology and allows you to demonstrate your learning of qualitative research principles taught thus far in the course.
Make sure that you use properly APA formatted subheadings in your work clearly demarcating your introduction, general ethical considerations in qualitative methods, research questions and justification for those questions, your target population, anticipated ethical challenges unique to your study, and finally your conclusion. Remember that the crux of this assignment is about ethics in qualitative research and not an in-depth and detailed research proposal. Therefore, ethics should be the overarching theme throughout your essay
Write a 2-3 page paper in which the following are addressed:
1. Explain the interrelationship between innovation and entrepreneurship.
2. Compare the risks and benefits of a social organization as it relates to change and innovation.
3. Speculate how artificial intelligence (Al) and robotics will influence organizations in the next 10 years. Provide specific examples of how this new
technology has encouraged new business creation or growth.
4. Describe at least two risks that new technologies may present to existing industry models and economic systems.
Include at least two references from professional and reputable sources to support your assertions or arguments.
This course requires use of new Writing Standards. The format is different than other University courses. Please take a moment to review the documentation for details.